Overview of current atmospheric reanalyses
Arctic System Reanalysis (ASR): 2000-2011
The Arctic System Reanalysis (ASR), which can be viewed as a blend of modeling and observations, will provide a high resolution description in space (10-30 km) and time (3 hourly) of the atmosphere-sea ice-land surface system of the Arctic. There are two versions of ASR:
Arctic System Reanalysis-Interim (ASR-int)
Source: The Ohio State University, Byrd Polar Research Center, Polar Meteorology Group
Time Range: 2000-2010
Assimilation: WRFDA-3DVAR
Model Resolution: 30 km, 71 sigma levels
Model Output Resolution: 30 km
Publicly Available Dataset Resolution: 30 km
Dataset Output Times and Time Averaging: 3-hourly for surface and upper air fields
Monthly means of selected variables
Here is the dataset location: http://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds631.4/
A new version is expected late 2012.
Arctic System Reanalysis-Final (ASR-fnl)
Source: The Ohio State University, Byrd Polar Research Center, Polar Meteorology Group
Time Range: 2000-2011
Assimilation: WRFDA-3DVAR
Model Resolution: 10 km, 71 sigma levels
Model Output Resolution: 10 km
Publicly Available Dataset Resolution: 10 km
Dataset Output Times and Time Averaging: 3-hourly for surface and upper air fields
Monthly means of selected variables
Dataset location will also be: http://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds631.4/
Expected available by end of 2012.
Data Access: Polar Meteorology Group
ECMWF 40 Year Reanalysis (ERA-40): Sep 1957-Aug 2002
ERA-40 is a global atmospheric reanalysis of the 45-year period 1 September 1957 - 31 August 2002. It was produced using a June 2001 version of the ECMWF Integrated Forecast Model (IFS Cy28r3). The spectral resolution is T159 (about 125 km) and there are 60 vertical levels, with the model top at 0.1 hPa (about 64 km). Observations were assimilated using a 6-hourly 3D variational analysis (3D-Var). Satellite data used include Vertical Temperature Profile Radiometer radiances starting in 1972, followed by TOVS, SSM/I, ERS and ATOVS data. Cloud Motion Winds are used from 1979 onwards. Various data from past field experiments were used, such as the 1974 Atlantic Tropical Experiment of the Global Atmospheric Research Program, GATE, 1979 FGGE, 1982 Alpine Experiment, ALPEX and 1992-1993 TOGA-COARE.
ECMWF Interim Reanalysis (ERA-Interim): 1979-present
ERA-Interim was originally planned as an 'interim' reanalysis in preparation for the next-generation extended reanalysis to replace ERA-40. It uses a December 2006 version of the ECMWF Integrated Forecast Model (IFS Cy31r2). It originally covered dates from 1 Jan 1989 but an additional decade, from 1 January 1979, was added later. ERA-Interim is being continued in real time. The spectral resolution is T255 (about 80 km) and there are 60 vertical levels, with the model top at 0.1 hPa (about 64 km). The data assimilation is based on a 12-hourly four-dimensional variational analysis (4D-Var) with adaptive estimation of biases in satellite radiance data (VarBC). With some exceptions, ERA-Interim uses input observations prepared for ERA-40 until 2002, and data from ECMWF's operational archive thereafter. See Dee et al. (2011) in the references below for a full description of the ERA-Interim system.
Japanese 25-year Reanalysis (JRA-25): 1979-2004, JCDAS: 2005-present
The Japanese 25-year Reanalysis (JRA-25) represents the first long-term global atmospheric reanalysis undertaken in Asia. Covering the period 1979-2004, it was completed using the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) numerical assimilation and forecast system and specially collected and prepared observational and satellite data from many sources including the European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), and the Meteorological Research Institute (MRI) of JMA. A primary goal of JRA-25 is to provide a consistent and high-quality reanalysis dataset for climate research, monitoring, and operational forecasts, especially by improving the coverage and quality of analysis in the Asian region. JRA-25 was conducted by JMA and CRIEPI (Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry). It has been continued as JCDAS (JMA Climate Data Assimilation System) operated by JMA on real time basis. The data assimilation systems of JRA-25 and JCDAS are the same. Users can use JRA-25 and JCDAS as one continuous reanalysis dataset. The second Japanese reanalysis JRA-55 (1958-2012) is ongoing.
NASA Modern Era Reanalysis for Research and Applications (MERRA): 1979-present
MERRA is a NASA reanalysis for the satellite era using a major new version of the Goddard Earth Observing System Data Assimilation System Version 5 (GEOS-5) produced by the NASA GSFC Global Modeling and Assimilation Office (GMAO). The Project focuses on historical analyses of the hydrological cycle on a broad range of weather and climate time scales and places the NASA EOS suite of observations in a climate context.
Data Access: GES MDISC
Home Page | References | FAQ | Atlas | Blog | ClimateDataGuide
NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR): 1979-2011
The National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) was completed over the 31-year period of 1979 to 2009 in January 2010. The CFSR was designed and executed as a global, high resolution, coupled atmosphere-ocean-land surface-sea ice system to provide the best estimate of the state of these coupled domains over this period. The current CFSR will be extended as an operational, real time product into the future.
Data Access: NCDC NOMADS | NCAR
References | ClimateDataGuide/
NCEP/DOE Reanalysis II: 1979-near present
NCEP produced a second version of their first reanalysis starting from the beginning of the major satellite era. More observations were added, assimilation errors were corrected and a better version of the model was used.
Data Access: NCEP NOMADS | NCAR | ESRL | KNMI | IRI
NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis I: 1948-present
This reanalysis was the first of it's kind for NOAA. NCEP used the same climate model that were initialized with a wide variety of weather observations: ships, planes, RAOBS, station data, satellite observations and many more. By using the same model, scientists can examine climate/weather statistics and dynamic processes without the complication that model changes can cause. The dataset is kept current using near real-time observations.
Data access: NCEP NOMADS| NCAR | ESRL | IRI | KNMI
References | FAQ | FGDC | ClimateDataGuide
NCEP North American Regional Reanalysis (NARR): 1979-near present
The NARR reanalysis was done to produce very high resolution output over the North American region. Observational inputs were similar to NCEP I with the addition of assimilated precipitation. The NARR model region was nested in a global, lower resolution model. Outputs are similar to the NCEP I and II models but with more snow, ice and precipitation related variables.
Data Access: NCDC and NCEP NOMADS | NCAR | ESRL
References | FAQ | ClimateDataGuide
NOAA-CIRES 20th Century Reanalysis V2 (20CR): 1871-2010
The 20th Century Reanalysis version 2 (20CRv2) dataset contains global weather conditions and their uncertainty in six hour intervals from the year 1871 to 2010. Surface and sea level pressure observations are combined with a short-term forecast from an ensemble of integrations of an NCEP numerical weather prediction model using the Ensemble Kalman Filter technique to produce an estimate of the complete state of the atmosphere, and the uncertainty in that estimate. The uncertainty is approximately inversely proportional to the density of observations. Additional observations and a newer version of the NCEP model that includes time-varying CO2 concentrations, solar variability, and volcanic aerosols are used in version 2. The long time range of this dataset allows scientists to examine better long time scale climate processes such as the Pacific Decadal Oscillation and the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation as well as looking at the dynamics of historical climate and weather events. Verification tests have shown that using only pressure creates reasonable atmospheric fields up to the tropopause. Additional tests suggest some correspondence with observed variations in the lower stratosphere.



Comments (34)
Which is best for wind related issues
Re: Which is best for wind related issues
It depends on your needs, and which winds you are referring to. Ocean/SHem will have diffs in N/N when satellite data becomes available. 20CR is an ensemble of surface pressure only assimilation, no wind assimilation. the pressure gradients where obs are available should help the low level winds, but there is no upper level wind assimilation.
bottom line is that the 20CR is so new, you will likely have to determine this for your self, and we hope that you can share that information back here, as others may have similar questions. Be sure to search for new papers coming out and conference papers, 20CR is getting a lot of attention!
MB
Solar irradiances in 20th Century reanalysis
Re: Solar irradiances in 20th Century reanalysis
Re: Solar irradiances in 20th Century reanalysis
Thank you very much for the quick reply.
The NCEP model is forced by spectral irradiances but, if i understood correctly, the solar cycle variation refers to total solar irradiance only. This means that every spectral band of the radiation code increases equally (~0.1%) from the minimum to the maximum phase of the 11-yr solar cycle.
The last question was referring to stratospheric ozone. There is a prognostic equation for ozone, right? So, i guess there is a weak ozone variation in the course of the 11-yr solar cycle.
Stergios Misios
Re: Overview of current reanalyses
related to the use of two different data set
Re: related to the use of two different data set
Re: related to the use of two different data set
Re: related to the use of two different data set
Monthly uncertainy estimates of 20th CR
Re: Monthly uncertainy estimates of 20th CR
CFSV2
CFSV2
Hello all,
I have a question regarding the CFSV2. UCAR website states that it is a continuation of CFSR. But is it a reanalysis like CFSR or is it an analysis? Can we consider that the quality of CFSV2 data are the same than CFSR?
Thanks,
G.L
Re: Overview of current reanalyses
Hello all,
I am studying applicability of met parameter (P, T & Rh) derived from reanalysis products to GPS PWV estimation. I selected NCEP R1, NCEP FNL and ERA-Interim for a decade and use the values (P, T & Rh) derived from them for inter-comparison. R1 and ERA-Interim are reanalysis products whereas FNL is operational GDAS analysis. Is it feasible to use them for inter-comparison? Any help will be highly appreciated.
Prakash
Re: Overview of current reanalyses
Re: Overview of current reanalyses
ERA-Inerim
Re: ERA-Inerim
Which reanalysis most suitable for sat. product comparisons?
Hello,
I would like to compare globally gridded monthly means of cloud products derived from satellite observations (AVHRR,MODIS) with reanalysis products. I am tending towards using ERA-Interim but would be interested in the general opinion on this question. I would also be very interested in any recommendations which products to look at. I am aiming for cloud fractional coverage, cloud liquid and ice water path and possibly cloud top height. Any comments on this also wrt common traps and problems, parameters to investigate etc. are highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Matthias
Re: Which reanalysis most suitable for sat. product comparisons?
I can't say which you should compare, as it ultimately depends on your metrics and purpose. However, direct cloud data comparisons have been tricky, in my experience, since there are inherent differences in what is observed, and how the background models compute cloud quantities. Part of this is also the motivation for data simulators (e.g. ISSCP Simulator). I would encourage you to include radiation observations into the comparison, as those should be another variable where the feedback from clouds to the atmosphere manifests.
Re: Which reanalysis most suitable for sat. product comparisons?
Thanks for your answer. You are certainly raising an important point. We might include direct radiation comparisons but the current scope of the project will not allow us to do much. Therefore, we may have to stick with direct cloud data comparisons for the time being.
Thanks,
Matthias
Re: Overview of current atmospheric reanalyses
Re: Overview of current atmospheric reanalyses
I would say the Arctic System Reanalysis is precisely what you are looking for.
http://polarmet.osu.edu/ASR/asr_domains.pdf
Check the status of it at the links at the top of this page. -Mike
Questions regarding ERA-Interim
Re: Questions regarding ERA-Interim
Re: Questions regarding ERA-Interim
Re: Questions regarding ERA-Interim
Determining which observations are assimilated into reanalyes
Re: Determining which observations are assimilated into ...
I just took a quick look at the MERRA assimilated observations in Jan2000. I can see data near Summit in surface pressure, but not near Humbolt, GITS, Tunu-N or Petermann. I'm not so familiar with the stations data availability. If they were in the GTS, then they would be input. Note, that MERRA assimilates surface pressure from surface meteorology stations, not temperature, moisture or wind.
To look at this, I used MERRA's Gridded Innovations and Observations data, on openDAP at: http://opendap.nccs.nasa.gov/dods/MerraObs
It can also be downloaded from GES DISC: http://disc.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/mdisc/data-holdings/merra-innov
These are not yet well documented.
Re: Determining which observations are assimilated into ...
Re: Determining which observations are assimilated into ...
Re: Determining which observations are assimilated into ...
For the 20th Century Reanalysis (20CR, http://reanalyses.org/atmosphere/overview-current-reanalyses#TWENT ), you can obtain all of the observations used from the International Surface Pressure Databank version 2 ( http://reanalyses.org/observations/international-surface-pressure-databank ) for the entire global domain and time period (1871-2010) or for a subset period or region using the tools
courtesy of the Data Support Section of the Computational and Information Systems Laboratory at the National Center for Atmospheric Research from http://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds132.0/.
Maps of the stations available to the 20CR can be viewed at http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data/ISPD/v2.0/.
A text file with the stations available is at http://reanalyses.org/sites/default/files/groups/users/gilbert.p.compo/i... .
See the ISPD home page http://reanalyses.org/observations/international-surface-pressure-databank for more information.
Please let me know if I can of more help.
best wishes,
gil compo
Re: Determining which observations are assimilated into ...
Post a comment or question.